Talk:2017-2018/@comment-24544801-20170126210754

I know you're just registering disappointment and not necessarily leveling blame, but be careful about considering this a blog with poor upkeep. A blog assumes that it's an individual's mission to provide, filter, and codify content. This is a wiki, user-edited, so although some do take pains with standardization, it's to be expected that some additions will contradict others, that some will be troll scribblings lacking in credibility, etc. As to the idea that information is harder to come by -- in the site's early days there was some carry-over from the former Met Futures, but by reaching 2017-18 we may simply have reached the point in the planning process where sources en masse decided more discretion was best, in the wake of the Met Futures ban. It's good to have this much. As you say, there will be more surprises in store when the announcement comes in February. Not concidentally, the goal of the Met administration when they originally put pressure on the longstanding pronostication site.